Re: Apology

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 15 2000 - 12:37:13 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence H. de Bivort: "RE: Cons and Facades"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA03545 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:39:32 +0100
    Subject: Re: Apology
    Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 07:37:13 -0400
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20000615113712.AAA25696@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.50]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Diana Stevenson made this comment not too long ago --

    ><And 'what else' is a horrid way to define things....- - Wade
    >
    >I'm sorry - it was 2 a.m. and the only way I could think of to put it at the
    >time! I'll think harder in future.

    Hehe!

    Hey, upon redress, accompanied with the smart of having sounded like a
    rebuker, I remembered that one of my favorite definitions of science is
    'that which eliminates the impossible', and well, that sort of winnows
    out to "that which helps us look at the 'what else'"....

    The problem with apologies, and the acceptance thereof, is that the what
    else's are buried in the oh well's, or, even worse, the of course's.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 12:40:22 BST