RE: Cons and Facades

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 12:52:52 BST

  • Next message: Joseph: "RE: Imitation or transmission?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA26814 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:54:49 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31017458BE@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Cons and Facades
    Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:52:52 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Just to say, do you mean by your last comment here that learning for you
    means persuading other to agree with you?

    > ----------
    > From: Bruce Jones
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 10:33 pm
    > To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
    > Subject: RE: Cons and Facades
    >
    >
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Aaron Lynch [SMTP:aaron@mcs.net]
    > > Subject: RE: Cons and Facades
    > > None on this list has
    > > indicated a propensity to being led ANYWHERE. Second none on this
    > > list has
    > > been able to manipulate any other person on this list. Third since
    > > we on
    > > this list seem to be the only ones interested in memetics the only
    > > thing we
    > > have is an understanding of a lack of cohesive knowledge about the
    > > subject.
    > [BJ]
    > OK I will agree to being the new guy on the block so let me
    > add..."In my experience on the list."
    >
    > > The only facade then is the person or persons that intimate a vast
    > > knowledge
    > > and/or understanding of the subject. <snip>
    > >
    > > You have to be careful about making such a statement. The apparent
    > reason
    > > Vincent Campbell brought up Einstein was because Einstein was generally
    > > recognized as really having great knowledge and/or understanding of the
    > > subjects he covered. We also recognize that Einstein held such vast
    > > knowledge and understanding of relativity even before most of his
    > > colleagues acquired similar knowledge and understanding. Einstein did
    > more
    > > than merely intimate that he held such knowledge, too: he definitely let
    > > the world know about it. But it was not a facade: it was the real
    > product
    > > of talent and hard work. This does not, however, mean that Einstein
    > > thought himself too good to ever make a mistake or his theories too
    > > perfect to ever be revised.
    > [BJ]
    > I was not talking of Einstein. I feel that he was about 100 years
    > ahead of his time and in all reality forced advancement on the world by
    > making people attempt to disprove him. I feel that he was, and is and
    > will
    > be a driving force behind all theoretical physics for a very long time to
    > come.
    > > So if you really mean that anyone who intimates infallibility is
    > putting
    > > on a facade, then I would agree with that.
    > > [BJ]
    > This is indeed my presumption. I will target no one person or group
    > for such accusations publicly. Nor will I call them on it. What I strive
    > to do is two fold:
    > 1. Increase my knowledge level through discourse.
    > 2. Ask questions and, sometimes, make statements to force an open
    > discussion.
    > If I ask for proof it is because I do not understand the
    > problem...yet. If I paraphrase a statement to be just a hair off the mark
    > I
    > am looking for an explanation that fits the picture. If I make a
    > statement
    > such as the one about the "con" it is from personal experience that I am
    > talking. I will always try to give my personal opinion in all discussions
    > .... if you agree with me.. awesome I have learned something ... if not
    > ....why not .... I am still wanting to learn.
    >
    > Bruce Jones
    >
    >
    >
    > ==============================================================This was
    > distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 14 2000 - 12:55:55 BST