From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Tue 27 May 2003 - 17:23:52 GMT
Bill Benzon wrote:
[RB]
> Your last point, though, raises a question for me. If the mind does not
copy
> or replicate the (artifact or behavior, your definition) meme, then what
> does?
[BB]
<<Alas, Richard, I have no ready answer for you. I don't find the notions
of
"copy" and "replicate" terribly useful at this point. I'm am slowly
arriving at a way of thinking about these things that I like. But it's a
rather strange way and not at all easy to explain in bits and pieces. Given
a choice between a fairly deep understanding of one relatively simple case,
vs. a superficial understanding of lots of cases, I'd prefer to go for the
former.>>
So you're looking into non-Darwinian models of evolution, since Darwinism is
all about "copy" and "replicate".
I found the notes (not quoted) very interesting. Self-organization certainly
seems to be a phenomenon worth studying and one that Darwinism does not
readily explain.
Richard Brodie
www.memecentral.com
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 27 May 2003 - 17:29:24 GMT