From: Dace (edace@earthlink.net)
Date: Mon 26 May 2003 - 21:38:41 GMT
> From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade.t.smith@verizon.net>
>
> On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 02:58 PM, Gudmundur wrote:
>
> > But if it weren't for an existing interpretative context (scientists'
> > minds and other paraphernalia) published genes would not mean anything
> > to anyone. Similarly, for DNA to convey any information there has to
> > be the interpretative environment of the cell. So, a more accurate
> > view of information is to see it as emerging when some system
> > (scientist, cell, etc.) interprets a series of signifiers/signs (DNA,
> > letters, etc.).
>
> And there it is.
This is why the term "information storage" is incoherent.
Ted
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 26 May 2003 - 21:42:47 GMT