From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri 23 May 2003 - 00:36:27 GMT
>From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade.t.smith@verizon.net>
>Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>Subject: Re: performance
>Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:11 -0400
>
>
>On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 11:53 AM, William wrote:
>
>>I've never claimed that we have no knowledge of what happens in nervous
>>systems. All I'm claiming is that there are no memes in there.
>
>And here's a second for that motion and that claim, and at least that
>portion of that model.
>
>I don't know, really, what the vote would be in this forum, but I'd like to
>see one, role call.
>
>Step up to the plate.
>
>
My role as devil's advocate obligates me to say that we need to consider the
possibility that we don't know that there are memes in there. Going one step
further it needs to be considered that memes themselves might not be "in
there" OR "out there". What's so wrong with that?
Don't balk but was that a bunt?
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 23 May 2003 - 00:42:20 GMT