Re: transmission

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue 20 May 2003 - 01:56:49 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: more transmitting"

    >
    > On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 07:45 AM, William wrote:
    >
    > > I can't speak for Wade, but I don't have any problem understanding
    > > the claims of people who argue for memes-in-the-head that get
    > > replicated from one person to another. I just don't agree with
    > > them.
    >
    > You can speak for me. In fact, my little fingers were just about to
    > type something like - "you know, all my arguing about the performance
    > model might lead people to think I don't have a clue about the
    > memeinthemind model, but, they are so wrong. I understand the
    > memeinthemind model quite well. So well, in fact, that I reject
    > it...."
    >
    > So, thanks, Bill, but, I couldn't help but repeat it....
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    And then I explained not only how it worked (novel strings of symbols for meaning/referent associations being transmitted by one person and received by another), but also it is obvious on its face that this must indeed be memetic transmission/reception, that is, a sharing with an other of a meaning string previously uncognized by him/her.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 20 May 2003 - 02:02:18 GMT