From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue 20 May 2003 - 01:56:49 GMT
>
> On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 07:45 AM, William wrote:
>
> > I can't speak for Wade, but I don't have any problem understanding
> > the claims of people who argue for memes-in-the-head that get
> > replicated from one person to another. I just don't agree with
> > them.
>
> You can speak for me. In fact, my little fingers were just about to
> type something like - "you know, all my arguing about the performance
> model might lead people to think I don't have a clue about the
> memeinthemind model, but, they are so wrong. I understand the
> memeinthemind model quite well. So well, in fact, that I reject
> it...."
>
> So, thanks, Bill, but, I couldn't help but repeat it....
>
> - Wade
>
And then I explained not only how it worked (novel strings of symbols
for meaning/referent associations being transmitted by one person and
received by another), but also it is obvious on its face that this must
indeed be memetic transmission/reception, that is, a sharing with an
other of a meaning string previously uncognized by him/her.
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 20 May 2003 - 02:02:18 GMT