RE: transmission

• Previous message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: transmission"
• Maybe in reply to: Wade T. Smith: "transmission"
• Next in thread: Wade T. Smith: "Re: transmission"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Richard:
>It's another interesting aspect of memetics that most of the discussion on
>this list comes from people saying things that go counter to the general
>understanding of the field. Posts that concur with the mainstream generally
>pass without comment.

Indeed, controversy provokes! Agreement in general does not encourage replies (other than to give complementary comments or additions to that which is being agreed upon).

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

• Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: transmission"
• Previous message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: transmission"
• Maybe in reply to: Wade T. Smith: "transmission"
• Next in thread: Wade T. Smith: "Re: transmission"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 16 May 2003 - 11:13:42 GMT