Re: transmission

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 15 May 2003 - 20:32:25 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: transmission"

    >
    > On Thursday, May 15, 2003, at 03:31 PM, Joe wrote:
    >
    > > The mind is trained in associations between signs and referents
    > > (this is basic semiotics), and a meaningfully patterned message
    > > contains at least one sign that triggers a sign-referent association
    > > in the recipient, and most likely, as in sentences such as these, a
    > > semantically and syntactically ordered cascade of signs evoke an
    > > ordered succession of sign-referent associations in the recipient,
    > > each association a single pearl in a necklace of reasoning or a
    > > single link in a chain, or train, of thought. The individual
    > > sign-referent associations, having been previously learned, are
    > > already cognitively present and available for signal stimulation,
    > > but the order in which different associations are related may indeed
    > > be unique and a genuine transferral of information, that is, an
    > > understood sentence that someone has never heard or read before,
    > > producing a never-before-ridden train of thought - like this one.
    >
    > I love the fact that in this entirely wonderful theory of cognitive
    > semiotic process, the word 'meme' was never used.
    >
    > As it should not be. These wonderful processes of cognition do not
    > need it. The only thing that requires a meme is cultural evolution.
    >
    Actually, once the semiotic associations have been learned, the subsequent transmission/reception of novel strings of sign/referent associations is indeed memetic. Semiotics provides the structural skeleton that is dynamically clothed by memetic processes.
    >
    > > This [pratfall], so far as I know, the ONLY possible example you
    > > could give
    >
    > Alas, no, any aleatory element of the venue is also an example.
    > Adaptation to the environment during the performance is just as vital
    > and necessary a condition for memetic process as any intention. Thus,
    > even the most well-rehearsed and motivated performance of even the
    > simplest intentional idea can be mutated by the venue. The best laid
    > plans of mice and men, after all.
    >
    But, most performances issue from plans previously cognitively laid, whether well or ill.
    >
    > > You either confuse habit with addiction and
    > > neurosis or do not consider that people are often aware of their
    > > habits and still choose or feel compelled to continue to indulge in
    > > them.
    >
    > Here you abandon your previous argument, which was that all
    > performances need to be intentional or meaningful. I do not confuse
    > habit with addiction or neurosis, didn't mention either one of 'em,
    > but you seem to confuse habit with intention, and that is not valid.
    > If people want to indulge habits, that's fine and dandy. Culturally,
    > in order to continue a habitual performance, it merely has to fit. And
    > many habits, regardless of why they are indulged, can be useful to a
    > culture. Habitual conditioning is a part of many learning processes,
    > and culture uses as many processes as it can, as often as it can. Like
    > life, culture finds a way. And it finds a way through performance, not
    > through thinking about things. People are part of culture, and their
    > training within the culture is just as varied and useful as it can be.
    > Neurotics have a place and so do addicts, possibly, depending upon the
    > culture.
    >
    I never argued that ALL performances are intentional or meaningful, just that MOST performances are intended and meaning-motivated. You, OTOH, seem to be arguing that NO performances are intentional or meaningful; this position is, quite simply, false on its face.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 15 May 2003 - 20:38:08 GMT