Re: Not about embedded POVs

From: Chris Taylor (Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon 28 Apr 2003 - 10:38:15 GMT

Next message: Grant Callaghan: "When the government starts tracking down collaborators"

Previous message: Chris Taylor: "Not about embedded POVs"
In reply to: Chris Taylor: "Not about embedded POVs"
Next in thread: Dace: "Re: Not about embedded POVs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> it fits less well with the idea
> of mechanistic processing.

Bad choice of phrase - I mean that (for example) when catching a cricket ball you _do not_ do the maths, you just match to your previous experiences of catching (and the eidos of it you have refined over the years - in effect a fully functional toy/model of the behaviour, built by tuning though, not metrication).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Taylor (chris@bioinf.man.ac.uk)
http://bioinf.man.ac.uk/ »people»chris
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Grant Callaghan: "When the government starts tracking down collaborators"
Previous message: Chris Taylor: "Not about embedded POVs"
In reply to: Chris Taylor: "Not about embedded POVs"
Next in thread: Dace: "Re: Not about embedded POVs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 28 Apr 2003 - 10:46:23 GMT