Re: Jabbering !

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 20:15:17 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Jabbering !"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA05075 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Jun 2000 20:01:14 +0100
    Message-ID: <002601bfcfed$20a2c440$3807bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0006021447550.29909-100000@frost.umd.edu> <3937C5C3.F6EAA23B@mediaone.net>
    Subject: Re: Jabbering !
    Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:15:17 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Chuck <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 4:33 PM
    Subject: Re: Jabbering !

    >
    > Lawrence - I know what you are talking about -- I have been interviewing
    for a
    > few decades in my own and other cultures. I think you at least
    underestimate
    > self-deception, which, by the way, includes the interviewer's own
    self-deception.
    >
    > But then, perhaps I don't know what you mean by "intervention" - an
    example might
    > help.
    > A counter example: I was interested in the changes in oral sex usage in
    the last
    > 15 years. Everyone I asked in their 20s said that they practiced a lot
    more oral
    > sex because it is a form of AIDS protection. I pointed out to them,
    however, that
    > condoms would have done just fine - which they agreed to - and realized
    that they
    > were wrong in their reasoning.

    << Wrong reasoning !? Why !?
    I think you at least underestimate how simple the mind can work, how
    simple ideas can be !!

    It is just simple reasoning, you get Aids from sexual intercourse, no inter-
    course no Aids !!
    Oral sex is no intercourse, so !?
    (By the way, getting no Aids with oral sex, I wonder, blood !?)

    A counter example,

    A people 's saying, from kissing a boy you can get pregnant.
    So no kissing, no baby !
    So, what does the daughter say when she is exepting a child !?
    " But, mom, we never kissed !! "

    That is simple, but wrong reasoning !?
    I think you overestimate the IQ of people !!

    regards,

    Kenneth

    (I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 06 2000 - 20:02:55 BST