Re: Dennett article on post-modernism

From: Van oost Kenneth (kennethvanoost@belgacom.net)
Date: Mon 17 Mar 2003 - 20:15:57 GMT

  • Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1315"

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    > Do you have any examples of this happening in US courts?
    Kenneth,
    > > Already, in the US people were released due to the fact that their
    lawyers
    > > could show to the court that a " pathomeme" invaded their client 's
    mind_

    Hi Lawrence,

    The example I recall was about a rapist, I think it was in Florida, could be wrong though. I have the details somewhere, but....you know what it's like.... What I recall was that the guy had some defect by which his behavior was altered and he couldn 't control his bodyfunctions like he should do. I think it was in the beginning a genetic defect which did work thru ' to the brain by which signals were bad received and thus bad signals were to be send back....

    I have to find the article....

    Lawrence,
    > I would not consider braindamage to be a 'pathomeme'

    Maye I wouldn 't either, but it was the best term I could think of. But like the above describes, braindamage could result in the inplan- tation of a ' bad ' meme....

    Hope this helps, if not...

    Kenneth

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 17 Mar 2003 - 20:05:11 GMT