Re: memetics-digest V1 #1313

From: Van oost Kenneth (kennethvanoost@belgacom.net)
Date: Thu 13 Mar 2003 - 19:27:39 GMT

  • Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1313"

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade.t.smith@verizon.net>
    > If you anticipated a response from me, based upon previous
    > performances, and I did not supply one, then, no, I would not be
    > performing, and your delight or disappointment (I won't presume) will
    > also not be performances, within the definition of memetic performance,
    > unless you were to express this delight or disappointment.

    Can 't I than not ' see' your not- performing as a performance !? You do nothing, but I experience this not- performing as a
    ' performance ' from you.

    My anticipation, whatever that will be, wouldn 't in any way not be meaningful to culture !? Both our silence could be very ( ironic) meaningful to culture !?

    And wouldn 't our delight or disappointment not be meaningful, and thus be added in the cultural- pool, to a third party !?

    Kenneth

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 13 Mar 2003 - 19:14:27 GMT