Re: memetics-digest V1 #1304

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 06 Mar 2003 - 17:45:40 GMT

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1304"

    >
    > On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 11:49 AM, memetics-digest wrote:
    >
    > > And where it is not, which is in the time/space of the performance
    > > itself, is where the meme is.
    > >
    > > - - Wade
    > >
    > > I can't help but think the environment of the meme is the mind.
    > > That's where all the action takes place of cognition, use,
    > > transmission, reception and storage. Of course, all of these things
    > > are actions but they take place within the brain and the body.
    >
    > If you _want_ to put a meme in a mind, (and you ain't got any proof),
    > then, of course its environment is the mind.
    >
    > I _don't_ want to put memes in minds, because I'd like some proof that
    > I _have_ to, and you, nor anyone, has supplied that. So, the
    > environment I imagine for them is not in the mind.
    >
    > Where are they?
    >
    > I don't any utility to having them as some indescribable,
    > unanalyzable, ghostly entities within an already vaguely understood
    > construct, as the mind is not only intangible, but perhaps, like all
    > things having bases in chaos, unfathomable.
    >
    > So, in step with countless artists' descriptions of their own
    > performance theory, and with all deference to darwinian processes
    > which actually involve active and moving and performing entities at
    > all stages, I've adopted a cultural evolution theory which only
    > involves what we know of human behavior, and presents a moving stage
    > of evolutionary impact extrinsic to the individual- culture in all its
    > mechanisms.
    >
    > I don't see any way to enforce the memeinmind model, at all. It seems
    > like homeopathy to me- pseudoscience- fantasy- wishes.
    >
    And that sounds like behavioristic positivism. The brain is a black box no longer; we can see inside it, in real time, with MEG. It makes no sense to skip back 50+ years into the past and deny the existence of what could not be investigated then, but is increasingly being mapped out now.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 06 Mar 2003 - 17:42:02 GMT