Re: Fwd: The direction of the English language

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed 05 Mar 2003 - 06:18:39 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1299"

    >From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade.t.smith@verizon.net>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: Memetics Listserv <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >Subject: Fwd: The direction of the English language
    >Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:35:47 -0500
    >
    >
    >
    >Begin forwarded message:
    >
    >British Girl Baffles Teacher with SMS Essay
    >
    >Sun Mar 2, 9:14 PM ET
    >
    >LONDON (Reuters) - An English essay written by a British teenager in
    >text messaging short-hand has reignited concern among teachers that
    >literacy standards are under threat.
    >
    >The Daily Telegraph newspaper reported on Monday that the 13-year-old's
    >teacher could not decipher what the youngster had written.
    >
    >"I could not believe what I was seeing. The page was riddled with
    >hieroglyphics, many of which I simply could not translate," the teacher
    >told the newspaper.
    >
    >The teenager's essay which caused the problem began:
    >
    >"My smmr hols wr CWOT. B4, we used 2go2 NY 2C my bro, his GF & thr 3 :
    >kids FTF. ILNY, it's a gr8 plc."
    >
    >In translation:
    >
    >"My summer holidays were a complete waste of time. Before, we used to
    >go to New York to see my brother, his girlfriend and their three
    >screaming kids face to face. I love New York. It's a great place."
    >
    >Judith Gillespie, of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, told the
    >newspaper a decline in grammar and written English was partly linked to
    >the text messaging craze.
    >
    >"Pupils think orally and write phonetically," she said.
    >
    >
    >
    I don't think that the language submitted in shorthand would be appropriate for a chool esay, but I don't see this shothnd way of expression as a decline. It's more of an adjustment to certain circumstances maybe. I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of text messaging, but if people are loooking for ways to convey messages in a very concise and efficient manner, shorthand of some sort would be the way to go. It's LOL and AFAIK writ large with a smiley icon on top.

    If Shakespeare were alive today he'd probably be posting in electronic fora an be using net lingo and other such stuff himself. He may have thrown a couple disses and beee-ach's in there too.

    Language changes with the times, unless like you're totally stuck in the olden times or something. I ain't got no problems with the new grammar ;-)
    [obligatory degenerative wink emoticon]

    _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 05 Mar 2003 - 06:15:36 GMT