From: Grant Callaghan (grantc4@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat 22 Feb 2003 - 15:47:22 GMT
>The cognitive linguists (Turner, Fauconnier, Lakoff, etc.) seem to be
>referring to the frame concept of Charles J. Fillmore; cf. his widely cited
>article “Frame Semantics” (The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) 1982:
>Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshon Publishing Co.). As far
>as I can discern, Fillmore’s frames are more or less the same as
>Fauconnier’s mental spaces (1994: Mental Spaces. Cambridge UP; 1997:
>Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge! UP).
About the computer-mind metaphor that is entirely unacceptable to those
people, as anyone can see from scanning Lakoff and Johnson. In a sense,
their aversion to MIT/Chomskyan linguistics defines the identity of
cognitive linguistics.
Regards,
Gudmundur
Thanks for the reference.
Grant
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 22 Feb 2003 - 15:44:39 GMT