Re: Sue Blackmore lecture Wednesday 5.15pm London

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue 18 Feb 2003 - 01:25:02 GMT

  • Next message: William Benzon: "Re: Sue Blackmore lecture Wednesday 5.15pm London"

    > on 2/17/03 7:23 PM, Keith Henson at hkhenson@rogers.com wrote:
    >
    > [snip]
    >
    > >
    > > Memetics is really *very* simple. People have evolved to be good at
    > > learning. Memes (replicated information) are a large part of what
    > > they learn, clear back to the old stone age. Humans can't learn and
    > > pass on every meme that comes along so memes are in competition for
    > > the limited resource of human brains and time, thus setting up the
    > > conditions for Darwinian differential selection.
    >
    > This is as empty as it is simple. Social learning theory has been
    > around for a long time. Memetics has added nothing to that. The
    > "differential selection" etc. language is just pro forma Darwinian
    > boilerplate. It doesn't bring anything to the explanatory mix. That
    > people can't and don't learn every learnable thing is hardly a new
    > observation. This is no more than old wine in new bottles. The
    > biological language just adds a pseudo-scientific gloss.
    >
    I think that it adds a necessary context within which the behavior of idea selection can be more succinctly explained.
    > >
    > > Particular memes become more or less common over time because some
    > > are better at getting into new human minds. (Most memes are
    > > helpful--ultimately to the genes of their host--but a few are
    > > pathological, damaging or killing their hosts.) Memes vary (mutate,
    > > copy errors) and because of variation and selection ones better
    > > suited to get into human minds and be passed on further become more
    > > common and memes less good at being passed on become less common
    > > over time.
    >
    > More empty boilerplate. You need to say why people prefer some memes
    > over others. To simply say that some memes spread further because
    > they're "better at getting into new human minds" doesn't say anything
    > very helpful. That's as useful as saying that water runs down hill
    > because it prefers being at the bottom of hills.
    >
    Actually, umm, no. Water is not a conscious agent as people are; it cannot prefer like people can.
    >
    > Memetics is an intellectual strategy for avoiding the hard business of
    > explaining why people have the preferences they do. Instead, you just
    > lay it off on the memes. These magical memes have mystical properties
    > that allow them to sneak into people's minds. It's the memes that do
    > it. The minds are just empty vessels.\
    >
    No, what is already in the mind has a lot to do with what is permeable to it.
    >
    > Bill Benzon
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 18 Feb 2003 - 01:21:59 GMT