Re: memes defined operationally (from article)

From: Grant Callaghan (grantc4@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat 18 Jan 2003 - 16:14:57 GMT

  • Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: memes defined operationally (from article)"

    >It would in a sense indicate why the form of the fingers is the
    one we end up with. Figers are not ' made ' by cells and genes as we think, but are
    ' made '
    ( 'cut out' ) by cells and genes that commit suicide. That 's a big difference !

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    Most memes don't commit suicide. They just die out from lack of use. What we don't use, we lose. Their space in the brain is take over by things that ARE being used. That's how our environment shapes our brains. That's one of the basic realities that mark the difference between genetic evolution and memetic evolution. Cells can commit suicide but memes can't. Death is written into their code. If memes don't fit the environment they were transferred into, they just fade away from lack of use. It's their environment that does away with them rather than their internal structure. Memes have no telomeres.

    Grant

    _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 18 Jan 2003 - 16:14:45 GMT