RE: memes defined operationally (from article)

From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Wed 15 Jan 2003 - 16:33:15 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: memes defined operationally (from article)"

    Keith wrote:

    <<While I certainly agree that our minds are shaped by ideas with both internal and external sources, I think calling ideas of a sort that are never passed on (entirely internal) does damaged to the very concept of memes.>>

    It makes about as much sense as not calling genes that are never passed on genes.

    Richard Brodie www.memecentral.com

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 15 Jan 2003 - 16:32:15 GMT