From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 12 Jan 2003 - 20:19:52 GMT
> Inexact copies are one thing, but when the copy is different from the
> original in almost every instance and radically different in most,
> it's a whole different kettle of fish. The rules of a game may be the
> same for everyone, but the way each person uses those rules to win a
> game is different. No two chess games are exact copies of each other.
> If they are, it's usually not a game but an instruction. That makes
> the two things different.
>
> In addition, most transfers of information do not result in a copy.
> Out of thousands, even hundreds of thousands of people who witness an
> action or hear an expanation, only one or two will try to duplicate
> the action. Those who do will have to try many times to duplicate it
> exactly. Even then, there will still differences in performance and
> what the performance is used for.
>
> This is not Darwinism in my opinion. I doubt it is even Lamarkism.
>
What is being communicated is not the action so much as it is the
intention. Memes are semantic and signifying entities, and it is
meanings that are being memetically propagated.
>
> Grant
>
> _________________________________________________________________ The
> new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 12 Jan 2003 - 20:19:06 GMT