Re: Primate Rights

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2000 - 17:31:42 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: Fwd: Researchers Identify Brain's Moral Center"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA19544 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 3 Jun 2000 17:30:40 +0100
    Message-Id: <200006031628.MAA27867@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:31:42 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Primate Rights
    In-reply-to: <00060311574801.00520@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Primate Rights
    Date sent: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:42:35 +0100
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Fri, 02 Jun 2000, Chuck wrote:
    > >Robin Faichney wrote:
    > >
    > >> On Thu, 01 Jun 2000, Chuck wrote:
    > >> >Robin Faichney wrote:
    > >> >
    > >> >> On Thu, 01 Jun 2000, Chuck wrote:
    > >> >> >Before trying to reinvent the wheel on this one, why not read what other people
    > >> >> >have said on the subject
    > >> >>
    > >> >> What subject's that, Chuck? (Not that I'd suspect you of equivocation!)
    > >> >>
    > >> >People's emotional reaction to different enviornments.
    > >>
    > >> OK, so help me out here, Chuck. You have, I presume, done that reading.
    > >> So what's your take on biophilia?
    > >
    > >I don't have the time to dig out the bibliography now. My only point is that on most
    > >topics discussed here there is a substantial body of literature that is quite helpful
    > >and prevents having to reinvent the wheel.
    >
    > Precisely. And that information is what memetics is all about. Like it or not,
    > it replicates, every time someone takes on board something they read in a book.
    > And don't say "it doesn't replicate, it is replicated" because that's not a
    > meaningful distinction. Exactly the same can be said about genes, but the
    > active/passive dichotomy on which it is based is relative, not absolute -- a
    > fact that many people have difficulty with. You are obviously one of them,
    > and to remedy that, I don't think I can recommend anything better than to
    > read Dennett's book Darwin's Dangerous Idea, and let these memes into your
    > brain, to cross-fertilise those already there. It will help you understand
    > the principles of genetics, as well as memetics, and what they have in
    > common. Of course, if you're scared of being infected/converted you should
    > maintain your memetic isolation. And here's a prediction: that's exactly
    > what you will do, because you have too great an emotional investment in your
    > current ideas to take any real risks with them.
    >
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    As I recall, Robin, you have not been too open to accepting reading
    suggestions yourself.
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 03 2000 - 17:31:16 BST