From: Van oost Kenneth (kennethvanoost@belgacom.net)
Date: Wed 25 Dec 2002 - 17:59:11 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: Grant Callaghan
Since groups obviously ARE structured and structure tends to take place any time people get together, where is all this evidence against it? Eric Berne, pstychiatrist, now deceased, used to talk about structure hunger in human beings. Where do we see examples of groups that are unstructured? In what society do people not divide themselves up into leaders and followers and start making rules for members of the group to follow? I can't think of one. And even if we can find a few, they would only be the exception that proves the rule rather than concrete evidence that what we see before our eyes doesn't exist.
Hi Grant,
The tendency Wilson is taking IMO, is that groupselection naturally evolves out of a religious
undertone at the bias of any society. I don 't refute the existence of any structurial concept that
came out of religion and its impact on society, but I don 't agree with the notion that religion
tends to be the only catalysator for groupsbounding.
Amazing to see that groups with a religious bias are in his opinon more up against the
hazzards of life than groups with no religion... pure, evil force comes to mind to set things
straight, I am maybe less organized and less unified, but with a bash of a non- religious
hammer I will strike any cord in battle....
Kenneth
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 25 Dec 2002 - 17:41:33 GMT