From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue 10 Dec 2002 - 00:03:27 GMT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Grant Callaghan" <grantc4@hotmail.com>
> >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> >Subject: RE: Toward a new US-World dialogue
> >Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 08:36:11 -0800
> >
> >>
> >>At 11:42 AM 8/12/02 -0800, you wrote:
> >> >I tend to be pessimistic for the same reasons Wade mentions.
> >> >Wade's
> >>post
> >> >raises an interesting question - why is it that it is only the
> >> >common NEGATIVE that stands to unite large numbers of our species
> >> >instead of a common good? Or is that the case?
> >> >
> >> >I can only refer to my own experiences that when a group comes
> >> >together united over a common interest, a hobby for instance, all
> >> >is well while
> >>the
> >> >group remains small. Perhaps because they have all freely chosen
> >> >each
> >>other
> >> >as members. But as new members join and the group grows larger,
> >> >dissent
> >>and
> >> >disharmony also seem to increase. What was a unity of good now
> >> >shatters into sects or cliques. However, let an enemy of that
> >> >hobby appear and
> >>the
> >> >various cliques will unite as never before! My neighborhood is an
> >> >equestrian area that is being shoved out by encroaching suburban
> >> >developments. Horse people are notorious for their snobbery over
> >> >their particular breed. But now that the ability to even ride or
> >> >HAVE your
> >>horse
> >> >is being threatened, they've all united in a loud voice locally.
> >> >People
> >>who
> >> >were not speaking to each other mere months ago are now fast
> >> >allies.
> >> >
> >> >On another point, IMHO religion is one HUGE blockade to achieving
> >> >any
> >>kind
> >> >of mass unity, also. As long as people cling tightly to their
> >>religiosity
> >> >and identify their "self" with their religion, unless everyone
> >> >adopts
> >>that
> >> >same religion, we're doomed to discord and disharmony.
> >> >
> >> >I just don't think the sheer numbers of humanity at this time
> >> >bodes well
> >>for
> >> >harmony. The tribe is too large.
> >> >
> >> >Virginia
> >> >
> >> >Murrieta, CA
> >> >
> >>Good post Virginia
> >>
> >
> >The last guy to try a new religion was L. Ron Hubbard and he doesn't
> >seem to have made anyone happy with his Scientology.
> >
> >
> Would the Raelian's qualify as a religious movement? Church of the
> Subgenius?
>
Discordians? Temple of the Sun?
Soka Gakkai Nichiren Shoshu Buddhism?
NeoPagan Eclectic Wicca?
>
> _________________________________________________________________ Add
> photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 10 Dec 2002 - 00:04:56 GMT