From: Wade Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed 04 Dec 2002 - 19:38:42 GMT
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 01:41 PM, Dace wrote:
> [Derek]
> agreed with me that we can't simply discount, a priori, the
> possibility of
> action-at-a-distance applying to biology as well as physics.
Not much to disagree with there, I suppose, as 'simply
discounting' anything is, in most cases, errantly assumptive.
But, is not 'action-at-a-distance' still only a figment of some physics?
- Wade, who is not a physicist but does seem to recall some
Bohr-ing comments about this somewhere.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 04 Dec 2002 - 19:40:41 GMT