Re: Islam and Europe

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri 22 Nov 2002 - 04:19:13 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Islam and Europe"

    > >
    > >Then are you saying that memes are not transmitted through language?
    > >Or if they are transmitted from one generation to another, how? Where
    > >do the memes of religion come from if not through language? Are they
    > >recreated by each of us as we read the texts of the past? Is what we
    > >get from the texts only from our own minds and not from the people
    > >who wrote the texts?
    > >
    > >I'd say it's a bit of both rather than only one or the other. But
    > >that's my point of view.
    > >
    > >Grant
    >
    > "One must learn from him who knows." Language is one thing; teaching
    > someone how to ride a bicycle is another thing. Riding a bicycle is a
    > meme; but it is not describable in language in a way that can fully
    > transmit its meaning.
    >
    Actually, I did this onlist - it's in the archives somewhere.
    >
    > Memes of religion come from master to student. Texts are dead,
    > especially in the hands of those who lack understanding. A teacher
    > with understanding can use a text; a teacher without understanding can
    > only abuse a text. Of course it is not a binary relation; there are
    > levels of understanding.
    >
    And who decides who does and does not understand a given text? And whether that person understands enough to make such a determination? In the absence of empirical evidence, such an imputation remains entirely subjective; one person's fool is another's guru, and verse-vice-a.
    >
    > I could write a whole book on Adobe Photoshop, but the only way to
    > teach what I know is by showing someone. Oral transmission is not just
    > about language.
    >
    It's about showing rather than telling, and that involves demonstration and imitation. I wrote a paper on this.
    >
    > Memes are not things one can be conscious of, when they are operating
    > within oneself; they "are" oneself, at a moment, unless they are
    > non-identified with.
    >
    Actually, one can be aware of memes that one does not even share. I certainly do not believe that if I murder an infidel for the greater glory of Allah, that I will enjoy an eternity in Paradise blessed by the erotic ministrations of 72 renewable virgins, but I am well aware of the existence of the meme, and the fact that others will kill and die because of their belief in it.
    >
    > - JS Gilbert
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 22 Nov 2002 - 04:21:56 GMT