RE: Jabbering !

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 16:05:46 BST

  • Next message: chuck: "Re: Cui Bono Chuck?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA00767 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 31 May 2000 16:07:50 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D310174588D@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Jabbering !
    Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 16:05:46 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    So you don't buy the crater of doom argument?

    I thought that argument had been done and dusted with the discovery of the
    crater in the gulf of mexico? (I was going to attempt to write it but I
    can't remember where the x goes).

    Actually, thinking about it, I remember hearing something about that crater
    being out by two million years or so on the time of the mass extinction, and
    that it was more to do with massive vulcanism in India (or rather what
    subsequently became India).

    Having said that, I thought there was still a mystery over why the fish
    (amongst others) didn't suffer a mass extinction at the same time.

    I'd agree totally with your point on the 'primeval language' argument
    though.

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Bruce Jones
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 3:50 pm
    > To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
    > Subject: RE: Jabbering !
    >
    > My take on Jabbering:
    >
    > I have been off line a few days so excuse me if I step on a conversation
    > here!
    >
    > na-na, ta - ta and similar mouthings and vocalizations are just like the
    > flexion of the muscles ... an exercise to learn to control the muscles
    > involved. The "primal language" argument is ...to me the same as the
    > meteor theory for dinosaur extinction ... good press-- no sustenance.
    >
    > Bruce
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Kenneth Van Oost [SMTP:Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be]
    > > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 3:03 PM
    > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > Subject: Re: Jabbering !
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: Mark M. Mills <mailto:mmills@htcomp.net>
    > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk <mailto:memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 5:58 PM
    > > Subject: Re: Jabbering !
    > >
    > >
    > > This brings the scientists closer to the theory that all
    > > languages originate
    > >
    > > out of one primeval language. >>
    > >
    > >
    > > Kenneth,
    > >
    > > I'm not sure I see why this work suggests the 'all language
    > > originates out of one primeval language.' Where would the 'primeval
    > > language' originate?
    > >
    > > It seems more sensible to consider the jabbering to be similar to
    > > arm and leg flexing, another popular activity for babies. In the
    > > evolutionary context, practicing 'na-na' or 'ta-ta' seems equally useful
    > > for alarm screams as saying 'ma-ma'.
    > >
    > > Any idea why a 'primeval language' should be involved? Maybe I
    > > misunderstand your use of the term.
    > >
    > > Mark
    > >
    > >
    > > << Don' t shoot me, I am only the piano-player !!
    > > I found the article in a magazine, I translated it and have put it
    > > on the list.
    > > So, if you want more explanation...I can' t really help you, but
    > > that doesn' t
    > > mean that I don' t want to discuss the matter with you.
    > >
    > > Do have one of the members more bright ideas about the subject !?
    > > Is there an American list-member who has more insight in what the
    > > scientists
    > > mean !? Perhaps the full rapport !?
    > > It would help us here !!
    > >
    > > Mark, sorry for the misunderstanding, but we will drain this subject
    > > to its
    > > lees !
    > >
    > > Regards,
    > >
    > > Kenneth
    > >
    > > (I am, because we are)
    > >
    >
    > ==============================================================This was
    > distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 16:08:31 BST