Re: Fw: An Individualistic Step

From: Chris Taylor (Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu 14 Nov 2002 - 11:00:47 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Aunger speaks"

    Interesting stuff. If we can assume that (a) 600cc is a 'small' brain
    (bigger than an average male gorilla I think), and (b) (para)humans weren't especially social, then I'd buy it.

    I can see how tribe formation might be facilitated by a challenging new environment (especially a colder one); followed by the classic feedback effect of modelling others' brains, to get to a big brain. Weren't we already dwelling in shared caves by the time we were leaving Africa though? I suppose a shared cave doesn't imply sociality... Do you have anything to suggest we might *not* have been particularly social about then? (I don't know what was in the Aiello and Dunbar paper you cited)

    Btw I liked (f)actor :)

    Cheers, Chris.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Chris Taylor (chris@bioinf.man.ac.uk)
      http://bioinf.man.ac.uk/ »people»chris
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 14 Nov 2002 - 11:04:15 GMT