From: Wade Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed 13 Nov 2002 - 13:54:13 GMT
A couple's work
Study says unmarried couples split chores better
By Patricia Wen, Globe Staff, 11/9/2002
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/313/metro/A_couple_s_workP.shtml
The egalitarian model for modern couples goes something like this: A man 
and woman both work, divide the household chores, and live together in 
harmony.
New studies find that this model applies fairly well for men and women 
who live together, but not for couples who tie the knot. Marriage, 
sociologists say, brings with it powerful social traditions that cause 
women to do a far greater share of housework - often twice as much - 
even when both spouses work and don't have children. Cohabitation 
doesn't come with the ''good wife'' image, so women who simply live with 
a man don't carry as great a housework load.
''Marriage still has a very powerful effect on people, even if they 
don't realize it,'' said Melissa Milkie, a University of Maryland 
sociologist. ''When you marry, you get a list of expectations about the 
good wife and the good husband. When you cohabitate, you're just sharing 
a household.''
Joy Clark, 30, who married her husband in May after living with him for 
more than a year, said becoming a ''wife'' changed what others expected 
of her. Both civil engineers from North Andover, she and her husband 
have always shared cooking, dishes, and laundry fairly equally - and now 
she's worried she's being judged by relatives as unwifely because of it.
''It's as if I should now be taking care of my husband and creating my 
nest,'' she said.
New studies comparing live-in and married couples give researchers a 
novel way to show just how social traditions - the nurturing wife and 
the money-earning husband - continue to affect today's working couples. 
Sociologists have long known the importance of other factors in 
explaining the imbalance in chores, including each spouse's work hours 
and earnings, educational levels and the presence of children.
But these factors never fully explained one persistent finding: In study 
after study, men never shared equally in the drudgery of routine 
household work, such as cooking, cleaning, and laundry, even when they 
worked fewer hours or earned less money than their wives. Several 
studies in the past year put a married man's contribution to housework 
at anywhere from seven to 10 hours a week, compared to a wife's 
contribution of 18 or 20 hours a week. The range depended on whether the 
definition of chores went beyond daily tasks to include raking leaves, 
paying bills, and maintaining the car.
Using the more liberal definition of household chores, a University of 
Maryland study this year found that typical wives spent an average of 
about 18 hours a week on housework, eight hours more a week than their 
husbands. In dual-income couples, the gap decreased but working women 
still did about six more hours of chores than men, researchers say.
In trying to understand the imbalance, several sociologists embarked on 
studies of cohabitating couples to see how men and women - free of 
marriage's social norms - divided household chores. In all these 
studies, they found that cohabitating couples shared more equitably 
(though women still did quite a bit more) and they also were happier as 
a result of such a balanced arrangement. In fact, cohabitating couples 
were at greater risk of breaking up if they fell into traditional 
patterns and deviated from egalitarianism.
''There's a principle of equity that works for cohabitators,'' said 
Julie Brines, a sociologist at the University of Washington in Seattle, 
who has done extensive work studying couple arrangements.
One study of more than 7,000 married and cohabitating couples found that 
women in dual-income married households had more strife in their 
relationship than cohabitating working couples. Married women took on 
roughly 71 percent of the total housework burden and generally had to 
effectively ''buy'' their way out of housework by earning more.
Unmarried women who lived with men, however, took on slightly less 
housework - 67 percent of the burden - and did not have to earn more to 
shed chores, said the study's author, Lynn Magdol, a sociologist at the 
State University of New York in Buffalo.
Magdol said the added strife in married life has to do with wives and 
husbands still struggling to define their roles against conventional 
norms.
''Marriage comes with expectations about roles,'' said Magdol, who 
presented her study on household chores at this fall's American 
Sociological Association meeting. ''We're changing our expectations - 
and that's stressful for couples.''
In the end, she found that traditional marriages in which the husband 
focuses on career and the wife on home had the least conflict.
Philip Cohen, a sociologist from the University of California in Irvine, 
said his recent study provides advice for any woman looking to marry a 
man who will pull his weight in the world of chores: Live with him first.
In a study published in August in the Journal of Marriage and Family, 
Cohen found that couples who married after living together divided 
chores somewhat more equally than married couples who never lived 
together. For instance, husbands who had a cohabitating stint did 34 
percent of the household chores, but husbands who went straight to 
marriage did 30 percent.
It may be that men who choose to live with a woman, rather than marry 
her, are more nontraditional from the start, so they would pitch in 
around the house regardless of their relationship status, Cohen said. 
But he believes his study shows that men who live with women simply 
become trained in the rules of equal co-habitation, then bring that 
pattern into the marriage.
Ken King, a Newton lawyer, found that to be true in his relationship 
with his wife. They lived together for about five years before getting 
married eight years ago. He said his contribution to housework falls far 
short of 50 percent, but he thinks he and his wife have worked out a 
system of managing the household work while both working and raising 
their child. A key element is recognizing how you want to be different 
from your parents' generation.
''There's a danger of importing baggage into marriage,'' said King, 48. 
''You don't want to think this will be like Mom and Pop or Ozzie and 
Harriet.''
Patricia Wen can be reached at wen@globe.com.
This story ran on page B1 of the Boston Globe on 11/9/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 13 Nov 2002 - 13:58:04 GMT