Re: The terrorism meme

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat 09 Nov 2002 - 18:20:29 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "RE: The terrorism meme"

    > >From: Jeremy Bradley <jeremyb@nor.com.au>
    > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >Subject: Re: The terrorism meme
    > >Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 16:21:15 +1100
    > >
    > >At 10:31 PM 8/11/02 -0600, you wrote:
    > > >> Snip.........
    > > >> >>When I say the means we use shape the ends we
    > > >> >> get, that's what I mean. The means we used to fight Russia in
    > > >> >> Afghanistan led to the Taliban taking control. It led to the
    > > >> >> creation of Al Quaeda (the list of reliable agents who were
    > > >> >> trained and proved their worth in Afghanistan) We are taking
    > > >> >> the expedient route to solve a problem that is much deeper and
    > > >> >> will last much longer than the means we are using will solve.
    > > >>
    > > >> Hi peace lovers
    > > >> There is a great kid's song that carries a memetic warning of
    > > >> this action - over-reaction tendency in some human cultures; it
    > > >> is called 'There Was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Fly'. Do you
    > > >> know it? On the surface it is a silly song, but the meme is solid
    > > >> and stable. Each time she takes a more drastic remedy until she
    > > >> dies - not of the complaint but the cures. (last chorus of long
    > > >> song) She swallowed a horse to catch the cow She swallowed the
    > > >> cow to chase the dog (what a hog, she swallowed a dog) She
    > > >> swallowed the dog to catch the cat (imagine that, she swallowed a
    > > >> cat) She swallowed the cat to catch the bird - and so on through
    > > >> the spider and the fly This is a straight out pedagogical ditty -
    > > >> with observable and quantifiable memes. Who was it who said that
    > > >> if we refuse the lessons of history, we are destined to repeat
    > > >> them, (or something like that)? Peace be with you Jeremy
    > > >>
    > > >And in this case, to not cure the disease will be to suffer greatly
    > > >from
    > >it,
    > > >and to abandon the Iraqi people to suffer. But it isn't PC liberal
    > > >to liberate them, or even to notice that they exist except as
    > > >anstract lives that have to be preserved from the spectre of
    > > >'collateral damage', not oppressed human serfs quietly yearning for
    > > >freedom (because to do so out loud earns a bullet - after the
    > > >torture); it certainly ain't cool to
    > >notice
    > > >that they are terrorized and enslaved. Their lives do not rest in
    > > >peace; they are quietly desperate by dual necessity.
    > > >>
    > >Steady Joe
    > >I was not being specific here. BTW the jury is still out on much of
    > >what you present as fact. AND there are worse things happening in
    > >countries which have no oil but are 'friendly to the West' - what
    > >about them? AND other countries sponsor terrorism AND have WMDs. All
    > >that I was commenting on was the repetition of history and the way
    > >that we won't know if we are being hoodwinked until it's too late.
    > >There is a lot of biased media around - well all of it really - but
    > >if you want to get a reasonable picture of what's going on, shop
    > >around. There are online English news services in most countries. As
    > >they are all partisan, if you take a reasoned, neutral overview you
    > >will be close to the 'truth' of events. Stay cool buddy, we live in
    > >interesting times.
    > >
    > The problem with the repetition of history argument is that it cuts
    > both ways. One could easily draw comparisons to Vietnam and how we
    > were blindly led into that war. Yet one could also draw comparisons
    > (as many usually do) to World War II and appeasement of Hitler. I
    > don't know that either comparison works out all that well in an
    > historically unique situation.
    >
    > IIRC comparisons were drawn between Gamel Abdel Nasser and Hitler in
    > the time period leading up to Britain, France and Israel's attack on
    > Egypt in the Suez campaign. Nasser was a nasty chap in many ways, but
    > he stuck around and gave rise to Sadat, who eventually wound up having
    > the guts to make a difference that counted (and paying the ultimate
    > price for peace).
    >
    > If Husayn were to kick the bucket any time soon, thanks to mother
    > nature, would a Sadat clone take his place?
    >
    No. One of his two sine, Uday or Osai, would. They are both nasty pieces of work.
    > _________________________________________________________________ Add
    > photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
    > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 09 Nov 2002 - 18:23:57 GMT