Re: Mini case study of memetic mutation

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat 09 Nov 2002 - 16:49:17 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: The terrorism meme"

    >From: Keith Henson <hkhenson@cogeco.ca>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: Mini case study of memetic mutation
    >Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 11:30:36 -0500
    >
    >At 11:13 PM 06/11/02 -0800, Bill Spight <bspight@pacbell.net> wrote:
    >>Dear Richard,
    >>
    >> > <<Note that this memetic evolution is entirely in terms of expressions.
    >> > <smile>, <s>, and :-) all mean the same thing. This means that memes
    >>are
    >> > *not* ideas, at least not all memes. The idea stayed the same while the
    >> > expression evolved. Those favoring internal memes need to account for
    >> > such change.>>
    >> >
    >> > I'm not sure I get your point here, Bill. How does the fact that
    >>"<smile>,
    >> > <s>, and :-) all mean the same thing" lead to the conclusion that not
    >>all
    >> > memes are ideas? Are you saying that ideas are not involved in my
    >>choosing
    >> > how I express myself?
    >> >
    >>Ideas may be involved in how we express ourselves, and, in general,
    >>alternatives differ in both denotation and connotation. But ideas are
    >>general and abstract. (The OED gives some senses of "idea" that would, I
    >>think, apply to expressions per se, but they are obsolete.) In this case
    >>we have three different expressions of the same idea. They were in
    >>direct competition, and that is why, I think, one scored a clear
    >>victory. That process of variation and selection did not occur on the
    >>level of ideas, but it was still the variation and selection of memes.
    >>
    >>Phonemes are even clearer examples of memes that are not ideas. Welsh
    >>LL, which is pronounced like HL with the tongue in the L position when
    >>the H is made, has two descendents in English, FL and L, as in Floyd and
    >>Lloyd.
    >>
    >>If you restrict memes to ideas you leave out a good bit of culture.
    >
    >I have used the infectiousness of certain speech cluttering phrases such as
    >"you know" and "fact of the matter" as examples of infectious behaviors.
    >As you point out here, they are memes that just don't make the grade as
    >ideas.
    >
    Wait a minute. Has there been a memetic "inversion" event I'm not aware of? As a matter of fact, I thought a popular phrase was "matter of fact".

    The fact of the matter may be that it goes both ways.
    >
    >Most ideas are also memes, but you can have an idea that you don't
    >communicate. The idea then fails a main test of being a meme (replication)
    >though it may be a potential meme. (Until the holder dies, it could be
    >replicated.)
    >
    >I like these corner cases. They make nice examples of how far the meme
    >concept can go and where it should be cut off.
    >
    >Keith Henson
    >
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 09 Nov 2002 - 16:52:48 GMT