Re: Mini case study of memetic mutation

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 07 Nov 2002 - 17:52:53 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "RE: The terrorism meme"

    > Dear Joe,
    >
    > +> Phonemes are not ideas, for they do not inculcate meaning, but
    > > morphemes are.
    >
    > Indeed, morphemes are meaningful.
    >
    > > Emoticons inculcate meaning, inasmuch as their
    > > function, like that of morphemic prefixes and suffixes, is to modify
    > > what is already present respecting its semantic content.
    >
    > Emoticons are meaningful, too. They are lexemes, no?
    >
    > However, being meaningful does not make something an idea (in the
    > modern sense). Meanings are ideas.
    >
    > In any event, just as words are not scientific units in linguistics,
    > as the question of what is a word is too vague, so I think that the
    > question of what is an idea is too vague for scientific purposes.
    >
    They are not concrete ideas themselves, but modifiers of the connotations of the ideas to which they are attached.
    >
    > Best,
    >
    > Bill
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 07 Nov 2002 - 17:56:41 GMT