Re: Jabbering !

From: Mark M. Mills (mmills@htcomp.net)
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 16:58:05 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Jabbering !" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA24277 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 28 May 2000 15:47:54 +0100
X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
Message-Id: <a04310104b556ee1fe2f2@[207.17.188.51]>
In-Reply-To: <000c01bfc886$d8215820$8301bed4@default>
References: <000c01bfc886$d8215820$8301bed4@default>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 09:58:05 -0600
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From: "Mark M. Mills" <mmills@htcomp.net>
Subject: Re: Jabbering !
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1252592844==_ma============"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

    >This brings the scientists closer to the theory that all languages originate
    >out of one primeval language. >>

    Kenneth,

    I'm not sure I see why this work suggests the 'all language
    originates out of one primeval language.' Where would the 'primeval
    language' originate?

    It seems more sensible to consider the jabbering to be similar to arm
    and leg flexing, another popular activity for babies. In the
    evolutionary context, practicing 'na-na' or 'ta-ta' seems equally
    useful for alarm screams as saying 'ma-ma'.

    Any idea why a 'primeval language' should be involved? Maybe I
    misunderstand your use of the term.

    Mark

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 28 2000 - 15:48:26 BST