Re: Standard definition

From: Van oost Kenneth (kennethvanoost@belgacom.net)
Date: Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 11:16:39 GMT

Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: Standard definition"

Previous message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: I know one when I see one"
In reply to: Wade Smith: "Re: Standard definition"
Next in thread: Wade Smith: "Re: Standard definition"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

----- Original Message ----- From: "Wade Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
> Another nutshell, and one that cracks Joe's 'non-behavior is behavior'
> koan.

I impose the next phrase,

' Having no reaction at all, is still a reaction ', which have huge consequences !

Kenneth

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: Standard definition"
Previous message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: I know one when I see one"
In reply to: Wade Smith: "Re: Standard definition"
Next in thread: Wade Smith: "Re: Standard definition"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 11:03:58 GMT