From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 07:37:08 GMT
On Friday, November 1, 2002, at 07:03 , derek gatherer wrote:
> c) showing how one can make deductions concerning
> social contagion using purely observable data aligned
> to computational models, so internalist theoretical
> foundations are unnecessary:
> http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/5.html
Interesting paper, interesting conclusion. Of course, I agree with what 
you say above, and your reason for saying it, as I also feel that 
internalist theoretical foundations are unnecessary. Social contagion is 
itself a worthy phrase, one I should use more often in my own 
bramble-thrashing.
The memetic isolation piece was also very interesting.
But, if I may, could I ask you, and all, to ponder how you would set up 
a clinical situation to gather data about some memetic theory, either 
internalist or externalist? So far, the data used in memetic papers has 
come from other sources. Assuming funds, and using available computers 
and other tools, does anyone have an experimental setup to gather some 
data towards answering any of the memetic riddles?
Is there any possible experiment to show Joe's meme-ory, or to prove the 
presence of a meme in the mind? What conditions would be needed to 
gather data about behavioral change due to a single, controlled, memetic 
stimulus? Is there an experiment even possible? Internalist emes have 
been used, as you say, mostly as post-hoc explanations of cause without 
any empirical mechanism demonstrated.
It's time to show some protocols, I think.
Unfortunately, the only experimental conditions I can imagine to set up 
would be hideously unethical, if not downright cruel.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 07:41:00 GMT