From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat 02 Nov 2002 - 22:41:53 GMT
Action and perception both proceed from the interface between self and 
world; perception flows inward, and action flows outward.  But either in 
the absence of the other is never found, as each action causes a 
perceptual change, and every attending to a perception requires 
focusing action.  They are two poles of the same system, and by 
amputating one of the poles (the internal one), your stance idealizes the 
real to the point of distortion, bifurcating a system composed of two 
distinguishable yet inseparable components, and then banishing one of 
the constituent components from consideration.  thus, you attempt to 
slice the internal side from the single internal-external system coin, and 
thus postulate an bemic or pemic abstraction in the mind (which is 
really ironic, since it is ideation itself which you reject) that cannot in 
concrete actuality perdure.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 02 Nov 2002 - 22:45:49 GMT