From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat 02 Nov 2002 - 22:41:53 GMT
Action and perception both proceed from the interface between self and
world; perception flows inward, and action flows outward. But either in
the absence of the other is never found, as each action causes a
perceptual change, and every attending to a perception requires
focusing action. They are two poles of the same system, and by
amputating one of the poles (the internal one), your stance idealizes the
real to the point of distortion, bifurcating a system composed of two
distinguishable yet inseparable components, and then banishing one of
the constituent components from consideration. thus, you attempt to
slice the internal side from the single internal-external system coin, and
thus postulate an bemic or pemic abstraction in the mind (which is
really ironic, since it is ideation itself which you reject) that cannot in
concrete actuality perdure.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat 02 Nov 2002 - 22:45:49 GMT