Re: Standard definition

From: Bruce Howlett (brucehowlett@northnet.com.au)
Date: Fri 01 Nov 2002 - 10:17:53 GMT

  • Next message: Price, Ilfryn: "Built memes was Re: electric meme bombs (an aside)"

    Well I am pleased to see some things never change, restores my faith in human cussedness. Seeing both of you have been around since year dot, and I have been out of the loop for a couple of years, I thought that one or both of you might like to update me on the progress that has been on this topic. Or do we still have the behavourists v's the substantialists? PS: Voltaire sucks. Have you ever actually read his work!?

    Regards,

    Bruce Howlett

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: derek gatherer
      To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
      Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:23 PM
      Subject: Re: Standard definition

      Aaron:
      But don't let me retard your work. Do publish those
      data you collected 4 years ago on how rule changes
      in football have influenced players' behaviour, for
      instance. Or tell us where to find it published. I
      never meant to discourage this work,

      Derek:
      Ah unfortunately, I decided the data I collected were
      not strong enough to merit publication. I had to
      leave the university just at that time, and my access
      to the video analysis software was cut off. I could
      of course have written a thought contagionist analysis
      of football, in which case I wouldn't really have
      required any data, but I leave that to those who are
      better qualified. That's the trouble with being an
      empiricist, you see, one is so constrained by that
      annoying necessity to actually have some evidence.

      Aaron:
      arguments, or even my more serious ogoing work. I
      like to
      think that even people who are "mouth-foamingly
      angry" can
      cool off enough to finish the tasks they have
      chosen.

      Derek:
      Oh actually I find it quite invigorating. A bit of
      passion in any task is often the thing needed to get
      it going. I think I can honestly say that, if it
      hadn't been for your consistent goading all these
      years, I probably would have lost interest and gone
      back to something more biological. So I have to thank
      you for that, to paraphrase Voltaire, if you didn't
      exist I'd need to invent you (although of course I'm
      no Voltaire).

      __________________________________________________
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Everything you'll ever need on one web page
      from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
      http://uk.my.yahoo.com

      ===============================================================
      This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
      Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
      For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
      see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 01 Nov 2002 - 10:22:07 GMT