Re: electric meme bombs

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 31 Oct 2002 - 20:48:04 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Standard definition"

    >
    > On Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 03:18 , Bill Spight wrote:
    >
    > > But you see the need for similarity, and similarity is all it takes
    > > for token identity.
    >
    > Hmm, almost yes. It's the _identity_ I have problems with. And the
    > need for tokens being passed. But, yes, the similarity is a very
    > possible part of the bemetic process.
    >
    > But it ain't demanded.
    >
    Similarity is how one may categorize a token as a token of type A rather than of type B, C, D, etc., the tokens of which it does NOT resemble.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 31 Oct 2002 - 20:52:11 GMT