Re: Standard definition

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu 31 Oct 2002 - 02:35:29 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Standard definition"

    On Tuesday, October 29, 2002, at 09:01 , AaronLynch@aol.com wrote:

    > However, to skeptics, making too much use of even that
    > consensus may cause problems. For example, our journal is
    > called Journal of Memetics -- Evolutionary Models of
    > Information Transmission.

    Don't forget the mention in the Mini-Annals of Improbable Results of the Journal as one of the least read examples of narrow-focus publications.

    - Wade

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 31 Oct 2002 - 02:40:14 GMT