Re: Standard definition

From: AaronLynch@aol.com
Date: Wed 30 Oct 2002 - 17:26:40 GMT

  • Next message: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: Standard definition"

    In a message dated 10/30/2002 6:17:02 AM Central Standard Time, wade_smith@harvard.edu writes:

    > Subj: Re: Standard definition
    > Date: 10/30/2002 6:17:02 AM Central Standard Time
    > From: wade_smith@harvard.edu (Wade T.Smith)
    > Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    > Reply-to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    <snip>

    > > Aaron:
    > > Nor do I have to deal with people insisting that only
    > > external behaviors or artifacts can qualify as
    > > "ideas."
    >
    > Interesting. Who is doing that?

    No one, is doing that as far as I know. That is precisely why I do not have to deal with it.

    --Aaron Lynch

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 30 Oct 2002 - 17:30:50 GMT