Re: I know one when I see one

From: Bill Spight (bspight@pacbell.net)
Date: Wed 30 Oct 2002 - 16:14:29 GMT

Next message: William Benzon: "Re: Standard definition"

Previous message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: I know one when I see one"
In reply to: Grant Callaghan: "Re: I know one when I see one"
Next in thread: Grant Callaghan: "Re: I know one when I see one"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dear Grant,

> >How do the genes for blood type affect cell division?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Bill
> >
> By being part of the information that replicates itself in the process.

Do you lose anything essential to the process by substituting "is replicated" for "replicates itself"? By doing so, don't you in fact get a more accurate description?

Best,

Bill

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: William Benzon: "Re: Standard definition"
Previous message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: I know one when I see one"
In reply to: Grant Callaghan: "Re: I know one when I see one"
Next in thread: Grant Callaghan: "Re: I know one when I see one"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 30 Oct 2002 - 16:17:34 GMT