RE: Meme-physics

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu 24 Oct 2002 - 23:06:00 GMT

Next message: Self: "Re: Meme-physics"

Previous message: Scott Chase: "Re: Meme-physics"
Maybe in reply to: Philip Jonkers: "Meme-physics"
Next in thread: Scott Chase: "Re: Meme-physics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>From: Vincent Campbell <VCampbell@dmu.ac.uk>
>Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
>Subject: RE: Meme-physics
>Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:35:26 +0100
>
>'insulting pink unicorns' is surely not civil behaviour....
>
>
Please elaborate? How is it uncivil to consider the alternative possibility that memes are illusory constructs? "Pink unicorns" do this quite nicely. Maybe I should just call it "mirage".

_________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Self: "Re: Meme-physics"
Previous message: Scott Chase: "Re: Meme-physics"
Maybe in reply to: Philip Jonkers: "Meme-physics"
Next in thread: Scott Chase: "Re: Meme-physics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 24 Oct 2002 - 23:10:29 GMT