Re: I know one when I see one

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 24 Oct 2002 - 05:07:23 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: VOTE DARWIN!"

    > Grant:
    > > Words are not memes themselves because they can mean anything
    > > depending on the circumstances in which they are received. They
    > > carry information but
    > are
    > > not the information being carried. The meanings they carry are
    > > arbitrary
    > and
    > > any word can stand for anything. For example:
    > >
    > > I am a man.
    > > I am A man.
    > > I am a MAN
    > > I AM a man.
    > >
    > > The mere shift in emphasis changes the sentence above so it
    > > transmits
    > four
    > > different meanings. The first emphasizes the word "I" and that
    > > points to
    > who
    > > is a man. The second emphasizes the word "A" and points to the fact
    > > that
    > the
    > > speaker is one of many men. The third emphasizes the word "man" and
    > > points to the idea of manliness as part of the speaker's essence.
    > > The fourth, emphasizes the word "am" and is used to confirm that the
    > > speaker is indeed
    > a
    > > man.
    >
    > Okay, the sentences by way of different articulation carry different
    > and separate meanings. So each sentence could pass for a separate
    > meme. But the separate words still carry the same meaning, it is the
    > shift of emphasis that adds a unique semantic flavor to it. So each
    > word, having a unique conceptual meaning and which obviously can be
    > replicated, are memes in their own right still. I acknowledge,
    > however, that some words can have more than one meaning depending on
    > the relevant context but that doesn't change the fact that those words
    > have stand-alone meaning and thus are separate memetic carriers of
    > information. You can experience this yourself by teaching a new word
    > to a 5-year old.
    >
    > Phil
    >
    This phenomenon is known as polysemy, and the foremost theorist in the field is (surprise!) the hermeneutical phenomenologist Paul Ricoeur.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 24 Oct 2002 - 05:12:15 GMT