Re: Stewart tes

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri 18 Oct 2002 - 17:16:34 GMT

Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: electric meme bombs"

Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: electric meme bombs"
Maybe in reply to: Bill Spight: "Stewart tes"
Next in thread: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: Stewart tes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>From: "Grant Callaghan" <grantc4@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>Subject: Re: Stewart tes
>Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:11:19 -0700
>
>>
>>H(1a): bemes
>>H(1b): meme-ories
>>H(2): pink unicorns
>>
>>My stance: dunno
>>
>>BUT, am I the only one pondering H2 as a possibility?
>>
>Without memories, what would there be to transmit?
>
>
I'm not disputing the existence of memories. If H(2) stands up and memes are but a mirage, then it is meme-ories or perhaps neuromemes that are in dispute (Wade's bemes too).

_________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: electric meme bombs"
Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: electric meme bombs"
Maybe in reply to: Bill Spight: "Stewart tes"
Next in thread: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: Stewart tes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 18 Oct 2002 - 17:21:25 GMT