Re: Enough electric meme bombs already

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 17 Oct 2002 - 03:19:10 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: electric meme bombs"

    >
    > On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 07:45 , Jeremy Bradley wrote:
    >
    > > I don't mind a little acrimony
    >
    > Hmmm. Perhaps it is both our natures, but, I'm not at all feeling
    > acrimonious towards Joe. In fact, it is the very levelness of the
    > exchange that condemns me to sustain it. I may not be successfully
    > championing my stance, but I've not fallen, at least, Beckett-like, I
    > don't think I have.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    And I do not see myself as having been harsh towards Wade. His stance is quantums of sensibility beyond Mooflic Rednonsense. We're debating the issues, not slagging each other - and that is how it should be.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 17 Oct 2002 - 03:24:08 GMT