Re: Why are human brains bigger?

From: chuck (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Tue May 23 2000 - 10:07:54 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: What is "useful"; what is "survival""

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA12163 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 23 May 2000 15:10:19 +0100
    Message-ID: <392A4A6A.F5FBBFD6@mediaone.net>
    Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 10:07:54 +0100
    From: chuck <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Why are human brains bigger?
    References: <20000523134746.AAA18874@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    "Wade T.Smith" wrote:

    > On 05/23/00 08:34, Vincent Campbell said this-
    >
    > >Let us assume that animals have beliefs, requiring them in order to act.
    >
    > Vs. Let us assume that humans have no beliefs, and do not require them in
    > order to act.
    >
    > And we can look at this side of things with much more ease, due to animal
    > behaviors that closely approach cultural actions (tic-picking,
    > food-sharing, courtship rituals) much more readily than we can look at
    > the first side of things, with all its rampant anthropomorphisizing of
    > these same behaviors.
    >
    > There is a _possibility_ that all we as humans do is below, or
    > unconstrained, or unneeding of consciousness, and that what we are
    > actually feeling is just that- feelings- arousals from the senses that
    > could be completely ignored with little consequence. Enlightenment is
    > numbness. Memes are dross left over from unheeded feelings, spilled milk,
    > and culture is all apology and contrition, and ritual explanation.
    >
    > It is more fruitful, IMHO, to look from this perspective- man as
    > reflected and reflecting feeler in an otherwise automatic realm. It
    > explains many things.
    >
    > And in many ways, it keeps us more continuous on this earth. And it loses
    > the soul, and good riddance.

    I sometimes tend towards this direction, but I am always dissuaded by the
    ability of some people - like Bhuddist monks - to actually decide to control
    what are ordinarily automatic body functions - like heart beat. Something
    else is afoot here that gives me pause.k

    BTW, what is "IMHO".

    >
    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 15:10:49 BST