Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA10547 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 15 May 2002 21:08:36 +0100 From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: pls direct me to a memetics list <eom> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:04:03 -0400 Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAIENJCPAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1190653353-2588591@smtp.clarityconnect.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> > >I have expressed on numerous occassions my interest in 'memetic'
> > >transmission in animals in works by de Waal, Dugatkin, and Pepperberg.
> > >
> > And regaring de Waal, what's his views on memetics in _The Ape and the
> > Sushi
> > Master_ again? Was he especially fond of memetics, burning with
> > enthusiasm
> > to jump on the bandwagon?
>
> No he wasn't. But I wasn't given the impression he had put a lot of
> thought into his criticism.
>
> Bottom line: Just because deWaal doesn't think memetics is useful to him
> doesn't mean deWaal isn't useful to memetics.
Or that memetics isn't useful to others of us. <smile>
Lawrence
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 15 2002 - 21:20:37 BST