Re: pls direct me to a memetics list <eom>

From: rrecchia@mail.clarityconnect.com
Date: Wed May 15 2002 - 14:07:33 BST

  • Next message: rrecchia@mail.clarityconnect.com: "Re: pls direct me to a memetics list <eom>"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA09943 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 15 May 2002 14:09:33 +0100
    From: <rrecchia@mail.clarityconnect.com>
    Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:07:33 -0400
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: pls direct me to a memetics list <eom>
    X-Mailer: WorldClient Pro 2.2.1
    In-Reply-To: <B9073D77.322%sd014a6399@blueyonder.co.uk>
    Message-ID: <1190654657-2510053@smtp.clarityconnect.com>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Steve Drew <sd014a6399@blueyonder.co.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:17:28 +0100
    Subject: Re: pls direct me to a memetics list <eom>

    > Hi Ray
    >
    >that sub heading.
    >
    > I agree.
    > >
    > > Variation is a good topic. A discussion of the different ways that
    > > variation is introduced in memetic systems would be interesting.
    > Pure
    > > random variation is not even seen in genetics, but memes seem to get
    > > varied using a number of different mechanisms.
    >
    > I thought that the calculations for the 'Eve theory' were based upon
    > the
    > idea that there was some random variation in the mitochondrial DNA?

    That was an overly broad statement on my part. I probably should have
    said MOST of the variation. I was thinking in terms of higher level large
    segment manipulation of DNA through crossing-over and jumping genes. I
    don't think crossing over occurs in mitochondria but I'm not sure about
    jumping genes.

    > Secondly, what part does radiation play if not random variation.?
    >
    The key is the word 'random'. While some variation in memes comes about
    because of purely random errors in reproduction, I think we can say that
    much more of it comes about through more directed variation. So for
    example if someone gave you a new wrench that was improved by having a
    better gripping surface and you wanted to improve it you would be more
    likely to introduce additional variation in the gripping surface rather
    than painting smiley faces on it.

    I like to think of this as directed pre-reproductive variation and
    selection. Others have referred to it as 'Lamarckian'.

    Ray Recchia

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 15 2002 - 14:21:08 BST