Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA23270 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:00:04 +0100 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:54:03 -0400 Subject: Re: Subliminal advertising Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAAEKCCOAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu> Message-Id: <BDDBA1B2-52D3-11D6-A1A2-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 08:26 , Lawrence DeBivort wrote:
> Oh, all right, I do mean to quibble.
Well, I suppose we can all quibble, we're good at quibbling, until an
actual study shows _any_ evidence of subliminal influence, but, as
you've seen, none has, and there have been several.
The single fact that the _only_ _supporting_ reference is a _fraud_....
Well. What is there to quibble about?
Unless you have some agenda to promote some charlatanry, there is
nothing to quibble about.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 18 2002 - 15:32:27 BST