RE: Thoughts and Perceptions

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Wed Apr 10 2002 - 03:37:19 BST

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: more on language"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA05085 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 10 Apr 2002 04:06:41 +0100
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Thoughts and Perceptions
    Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 22:37:19 -0400
    Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAOEBFCOAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    In-Reply-To: <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBIELDEKAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Nice posting, Richard. Lots of food for thought...

    Lawrence

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Richard Brodie
    > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:40 PM
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Thoughts and Perceptions
    >
    >
    > Scott wrote:
    >
    > <<Is visual observation pure seeing? Is there any processing before
    > something
    > makes it to the status of an observation as filtered through
    > limited sensory
    > channels each replete with tuning biases and possibly processed along
    > further steps up the hierarchy towards conceptualization and its
    > categorical
    > filters?>>
    >
    > >From _Virus of the Mind_:
    >
    > ----------------------
    > The universe is full of stuff. However, anything we say about
    > that stuff is
    > purely a concept—a set of memes—invented by human beings. All concepts are
    > composed of memes. For instance, the United States are only States because
    > we have invented 50 distinctions—memes—carving out that territory. Alabama
    > isn’t a reality, it’s just there because we say so, because we are
    > programmed with a meme for Alabama. If we didn’t have an Alabama
    > meme, that
    > land would just be more dirt.
    > Likewise, the earth is simply a distinction—a meme—we invented because it
    > was convenient to put edges around the place we live in order to
    > distinguish
    > it from the rest of the universe. To the universe, it’s all just
    > stuff. You
    > may say, “But there really are edges! There’s where the dirt ends and the
    > atmosphere begins, or where the atmosphere gives way to outer space!”
    > Really? Dirt, atmosphere, outer space—they’re all memes. If you think dirt
    > is really dirt, not a meme we invented for our convenience, then
    > all you’ll
    > ever have is dirt. If you see it’s a meme, and not the Truth, you open up
    > the possibility of other memes to talk about the same thing: elements,
    > crystals, subatomic particles. Remember, viewed through an electron
    > microscope, it’s all mostly empty space!
    >
    > How about this one: you are simply a distinction—a meme—we
    > invented because
    > it was convenient to talk about the parts of the universe that feel pain
    > when hit with a hammer. To the universe, there’s no you, or human
    > beings, or
    > giraffes, or solar systems, or galaxies. All those are human-invented
    > distinctions. They are all memes.
    >
    > Now one more point: everything I just said, about the distinction between
    > objective reality and concepts, is a concept. It’s a meme. To the
    > universe,
    > there’s no such thing as a concept. I just drew this distinction
    > because it
    > was convenient to use when we’re talking about memetics.
    > Distinctions are one kind of meme. They are ways of carving up
    > the world by
    > categorizing or labeling things.
    >
    > When you create a distinction, you gain access to some things and lose
    > access to others. It’s useful to be conscious of what
    > distinction-memes you’
    > re programmed with, and to know that all the distinctions you draw are
    > human-invented and not reality.
    >
    > Distinctions, as I just mentioned, are one kind of meme that
    > contributes to
    > your programming. Someone educated (programmed) in the memes of
    > French will
    > behave differently in France from someone who has no knowledge of the
    > language—his mind will recognize meaning where others will hear
    > only noise.
    > Someone programmed with the distinction Coca-Cola will be more
    > likely to buy
    > Coke than the store brand of cola. Her mind will recognize the
    > familiar red
    > can with the white swish; the store brand will not register
    > because she has
    > no distinction-meme for it.
    > The Coca-Cola company knows this, by the way, which is why their logo has
    > grown bigger and bigger over the years until today the entire
    > front panel of
    > a seven-foot-tall Coke machine bears the distinctive red-and-white
    > trademark.
    >
    > Advertisers, politicians, and anyone else who wants your money or support
    > are very interested in programming you with certain distinctions over
    > others, and understanding the distinctions you see the world
    > through so they
    > can take advantage of them. What are you more likely to buy for
    > breakfast: a
    > slice of chocolate cake or a “chocolate-chip muffin”? Calling a
    > round piece
    > of high-fat chocolate cake a “muffin” takes advantage of the distinctions
    > you have around breakfast food and increases sales. My local cafe has just
    > come out with scone-shaped brownies! Of course, no one would eat brownies
    > for breakfast, but scones—!
    >
    > -----------------------
    >
    > You may also be interested in a communication model posted at
    > http://www.memecentral.com/L3Communication.htm
    >
    > Richard Brodie
    > www.memecentral.com
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 10 2002 - 04:17:37 BST