Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 09 2002 - 00:30:07 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA02679 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 9 Apr 2002 00:36:18 +0100
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.222.132]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011
    Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 19:30:07 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F246CV4WR457yQU5y500000626c@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2002 23:30:08.0033 (UTC) FILETIME=[51C78910:01C1DF55]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011
    >Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 18:54:36 -0400
    >
    >
    >On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 06:21 , Scott Chase wrote:
    >
    >>Prior learning could even *enhance* one's ability to make critical
    >>observations.
    >
    >Even Sherlock had to see before he could deduce. At what end of this is
    >the enhancement?
    >
    Was he a trained observer? Did he have any general idea of what to look for
    when investigating?
    >
    >>There could be "unconscious" material floating around in your noggin
    >
    >Entering, as sensation, and 'floating around', are two very unique
    >processes.
    >
    Yet said material may be a result of being filtered when processed at the
    various levels such as sensation and conceptualization. BTW when does
    something become an observation?
    >
    >>that may influence observation
    >
    >"Many things stand in the way of knowledge" - if whatever is floating
    >around is _influencing_ observation, then observation is being thwarted.
    >What one thinks about what one sees is, well, not observation. It's
    >analysis. It's measurement. And, as good ole Pythagoras says, get out of
    >the way, please.
    >
    >
    OK lets start from scratch (forgetting the primordial rudiments of how
    theories have been genetically incorporated into sense organs previous to
    your being born). Returning to the quote I earlier posted from Popper's
    _Objective Knowledge_ (p. 259):

    (bq) "My experiment consists of asking you to *observe*, here and now. I
    hope you are all co-operating, and observing! However, I fear that at least
    some of you, instead of observing, will feel a strong urge to ask: 'WHAT do
    you want me to observe?'" (eq)

    So Wade, "WHAT?" is the crucial question to which you might want to give
    some thought.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 00:47:16 BST