Re: question about memes

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sun Mar 17 2002 - 11:44:06 GMT

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: FW: MD Dawkins on quantum/mysticism convergence"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA17133 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 17 Mar 2002 11:41:39 GMT
    Message-ID: <001b01c1cda9$217ea6c0$b5a9eb3e@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <kennethvanoost@myrealbox.com>
    References: <570E2BEE7BC5A34684EE5914FCFC368C10FBBB@fillan><000d01c1cb75$6d277880$e6a6eb3e@default><001d01c1cb86$43cc4040$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer><000701c1cc5a$6e9891a0$41abeb3e@default> <001101c1cc7c$82dcbd40$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    Subject: Re: question about memes
    Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:44:06 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Philip Jonkers <philipjonkers@prodigy.net>
    > Thanks for your explanations Kenneth. I recognize that Yates' actions were
    > understandable
    > in her own eyes. But I don't think one can call them rational unless you
    are
    > willing to
    > accept a more subjective definition of the word. To me the being rational
    is
    > synonymous
    > to a natural or logical code of conduct with a minimum use of extrasensory
    > assumptions or
    > basis. Ideally rather than usually perhaps, the rational mindset is owned
    by
    > the majority
    > of a population.If not, the population is likely to ultimately perish or
    > suffer as their ill-founded
    > actions are not compatible with nature or (rivaling) groups which do
    happen
    > to be rational.
    > Take the nazis as an example.

    Philip,

    I think taking the Nazis is a bad example.
    In Germany of the early '30 and early ' 40 the majority owned the rational
    mindset but did choose for Hitler !
    In their way_ war was the only option left open_ of course, the choise
    was largely induced by the Nazi- propaganda machine, but nevertheless !

    And to pre- suppose that the rivaling groups ( Europe) was ' rational' in
    the ' 40, I doubt that ! Seen now of course.
    Germany had lost for a great deal its social and cultural capital and was
    in more sense than others an outcast due to what happened 20 years
    earlier.
    OTOH, Europe was in complete turmoil, the ways by which German
    politicians were thinking was greatly influenced by guys like Heidegger,
    Nietzsche, Smitt, Jaspers. The Weimar- politics were not forgotten !
    To survive, the German people choose the best, possible option to them.

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 17 2002 - 11:52:55 GMT